Thirty clinical vignettes. Professor Jaquith described her exam as “pretty much all clinical vignettes … recognize conditions by the vignette”, with “SOME diagnosis but A LOT are next management plan, first line treatment, patient education” — so diagnosis lead-ins are deliberately capped at a fifth of each set and the rest ask what to do next. Named findings carry their description in brackets, so a term like ciliary flush is never the only handle on the finding. Every stem stands on its own — no question refers to another, because the question order is shuffled. Common ophthalmological disorders — the first lecture of Exam 2. Covers the eyelid and lacrimal conditions, the whole conjunctivitis family including chlamydial disease and trachoma, episcleritis against scleritis, keratitis and corneal ulcer, herpetic eye disease, anterior and posterior uveitis, pre-septal against post-septal cellulitis, the diagnostic modalities, and the red-eye triage framework. This is the management half. Clinical Pathophysiology I Lecture 4 covers almost this exact condition list from the mechanism side; this one asks what it looks like, what to order, what to give and when to refer. Where the speaker notes soften a slide, the notes win. Imaging is not automatic for dacryoadenitis, dacryocystitis or clearly pre-septal cellulitis, and hematology referral is not automatic for a recurrent subconjunctival hemorrhage — the slides read as though they are, and the notes on the same slides say otherwise. Every question cites its slide.
Answers reveal only after you choose. Your score and a breakdown by objective appear at the end, with a review of everything you missed.